Legal Opinion
Diversified Marketing, Inc. v. Estee Lauder, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1988No. 87 Civ. 7228 (SWK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Diversified Marketing, Inc. (“Diversified”), brings this action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief seeking a declaration that its advertising campaign for its cosmetic products does not violate federal trademark law or similar New York state statutory and common law principles. Defendant, Estee Lauder, Inc. (“Estee Lauder”), has counterclaimed on the basis of these laws and has now moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on its claims for common law unfair competition and for violation of New York’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cruz LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.B. THOMAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, and Universal City Studios, Inc., Intervening-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Deere & Company v. Mtd Products, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc. v. Nature Labs, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Duty Free Apparel, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- U-Neek, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.