Banuelos v. LA Investment CA2/1
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
The trial court dismissed Kevin Banuelos’s third amended complaint after sustaining the defendants’ demurrer to all causes of action without leave to amend. We hold the complaint states a cause of action for retaliatory eviction under Civil Code section 1942.5 and that this cause of action is not barred by the litigation privilege of Civil Code section 47, subdivision (b). We affirm the judgment as to the remaining causes of action.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Background: Banuelos I.
In 2008, Banuelos brought an action against the owners and managers of Park Granada, a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- 1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People ex rel. Alzayat v. Hebb, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Winslett v. 1811 27th Ave., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Kelly v. DenaultDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Flaker v. Butenschoen CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.