Legal Opinion

Alfaro v. Waterhouse Management Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 2022No. B313842Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/4/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX ALMA ALFARO et al., 2d Civil No. B313842 (Super. Ct. No. 17CV02185) Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Santa Barbara County) v. WATERHOUSE MANAGEMENT CORP. et al., Defendants and Appellants. This case illustrates the principle that an anti-SLAPP motion lies only as to “allegations of protected activity that are asserted as grounds for relief.” (Baral v. Schnitt (2016)

1 Cal.5th 376, 395

(Baral).) Here, the targeted cause of action mentions protected activity – the filing of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API