Legal Opinion

James B. Clow & Sons v. Goldstein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 22, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,331PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Mechanic’s lien. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

Plaintiff sought to establish a mechanic’s lien against certain property of defendant Goldstein, to the amount of $156.30 for certain bath tubs and sinks sold at that sum to Hoffman, a plumber, who, under a contract with Goldstein, installed them into a flat building owned by him, which he was at the time engaged in renovating. Notice of lien was duly served. The cause was tried by the agreement of the parties before the trial judge without a jury, and the judge, after hearing all the evidence, found the issues in favor of Goldstein and entered judgment accordingly, and the record is brought…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dehner v. Helmbacher Forge & Rolling MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Farr v. WeaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. Wong WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Portland Building & Loan Ass'n v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Schwulst Gerling Co. v. FrostAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API