Legal Opinion

Portland Building & Loan Ass'n v. Peck

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

Although variously stated in several reasons of appeal, the pivotal point of the appeal of Bielby, the sole appellant, is the conclusion of the trial court that the note and mortgage of the Pecks to Bielby executed and delivered on September 16th, 1926, were intended and accepted as payment of his claim for services and materials, instead of as temporary and additional security as the appellant claims, and that his mechanic’s lien, subsequently filed, was void in consequence. Unless the attack upon this conclusion is successful, those paragraphs of the appeal which question the order of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Sands v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  3. Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Cobb v. DyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  5. Chapman v. BrewerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Miller v. Lemon Tree Inn of Wilmington, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Scalabrin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941
  5. Equitable Industrial Loan Society, Inc. v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API