United States v. Mahady & Mahady
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before KALODNER, GIBBONS and WEIS, Circuit Judges. KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Were the Fifth Amendment rights of the appellant Henry J. Mahady (“Mahady”) violated when the district court ordered him to comply with an Internal Revenue Service summons directing him to give testimony and produce records with respect to all financial transactions of his law partnership with a corporate client under investigation as to its tax liabilities?
The instant appeal presents the stated question. Its background facts may be summarized as follows:
On October 12, 1973, Special Agent James W.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Woods v. DunlopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Mellon Bank, N. A., Appeal of Milton F. Meissner, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- In re September, 1975 Special Grand JuryDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1977
- United States v. MatthewsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.