Legal Opinion
Ennis Brown Co. v. W. S. Hurst & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1905No. 59PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action for damages growing out of a contract alleged to have been entered into between the plaintiff, residing in Sacramento, California, and defendant, residing in Aurora, Oregon, for the delivery by defendant to plaintiff of certain two carloads of potatoes. The complaint alleges that on or about the fifteenth day of April, 1901, defendant entered into a contract in writing with plaintiff whereby defendant sold to plaintiff and plaintiff purchased from defendant two carloads of potatoes at the agreed price of fifty-five cents per hundred pounds, “which said two carloads of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Pierce v. LukensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Maionchi v. NicholiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Philip Wolf Co. v. King StarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3Cited by11 opinions
- F.A.R. Liquidating Corp. v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- City of Stockton v. Frisbie & LattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Universal Products Co. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1935
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Van Harris, an Individual, Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Paramount Truck Rental, Inc., and Van Harris, an Individual Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Paramount Truck Rental, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Beatty v. Oakland Sheet Metal Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.