Legal Opinion
City of Stockton v. Frisbie & Latta
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1928No. Docket No. 3496PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, Acting P. J.
The city council of the City of Stockton, operating as a municipal corporation under and by virtue of the authority of a freeholders’ charter, adopted by the electors of said city at a special municipal election held on the twenty-eighth day of November, 1922, and approved by the legislature at its session of 1923 (Stats. 1923, p. 1321 et seq.), “duly adopted and passed,” as the complaint alleges, “Ordinance No. 858, which went into full force and effect on December 13, 1923, whereby there was created in said city certain residence and certain non-residence zones. ’ ’
Among the specifically…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Portage Township v. Full Salvation UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Sugar v. North Baltimore Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Minney v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- City of Idaho Falls v. GrimmettIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- McCurley v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.