Villarreal v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Appellant Robert Villarreal challenges the admissibility and the sufficiency of evidence which was used to convict him of possession of marihuana. We reject his arguments and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On August 10, 1983, appellant and another man were standing near two legally parked cars in Brownsville, Texas. Officer Celestino Oliveira recognized appellant and ascertained by radio that a warrant for appellant’s arrest was outstanding. After assistance arrived, Officer Oliveira arrested appellant and asked another police officer, Samuel Spencer, to take…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- McGoldrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Benavides v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MercadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Acosta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Zertuche v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- State v. Mercado, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
- Zamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.