Legal Opinion
Zamora v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 19, 1989No. 13-89-326-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
A jury found appellant, Hipólito Zamora, guilty of possessing more than five pounds of marihuana. See Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15 § 4.051(b)(4) (Vernon Supp. 1989). The jury assessed appellant’s punishment at eight years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. By two points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress the written “consent to search”, 1 and he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction.
By point two, appellant argues that the trial court erred in overruling…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- McGoldrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borrego v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Price v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Garza Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Wootton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.