Legal Opinion

155 N. High, Ltd. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1995No. 1993-2371PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 423.] 155 NORTH HIGH, LIMITED., APPELLANT, v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as 155 N. High, Ltd. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.,

1995-Ohio-85.] Attorneys at law—DR 5-101(B)(4) is an exception to the general rule of DR 5- 102(A) that an attorney cannot serve as both an advocate and witness— Attorney has burden to prove his services provide a distinctive value and that his disqualification would work a substantial hardship on his client. DR 5-101(B)(4) is an exception to the general rule of DR 5-102(A) that an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Ted JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & GambelOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. A.B.B. Sanitec West v. Weinsten, 88258 (5-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Goebel v. HopkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Karaman v. Pickrel, Ca21813 (8-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & GambelOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API