Legal Opinion

Karaman v. Pickrel, Ca21813 (8-15-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2008No. CA21813PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Michael Karaman and Invesco, Ltd., appeal the decision of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas disqualifying their trial counsel, Steven K. Dankof, from representing them in a legal malpractice action. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

{¶ 2} Appellants commenced the present action against their former counsel, appellees, Pickrel, Schaeffer Ebeling ("PSE") and PSE attorney, Alan Schaeffer, on May 31, 2002. Such action is based upon appellees' alleged failure to disclose a conflict of interest. According to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gould, Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carnegie Companies, Inc. v. Summit Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. In re E.M.J.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Weadock v. TahaOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API