Legal Opinion

State v. Garza

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 15, 2000No. 17982-6-III, 17983-4-III, 17984-2-IIIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKato, J.

The defendants in these cases, which we have consolidated for purposes of this decision, have obtained discretionary review of the superior court’s denial of their motions to dismiss. The cases require us to consider whether, and in what circumstances, jail officials may seize and examine criminal defendants’ legal documents. We remand for additional fact finding.

On July 25, 1998, officers at the Benton County Jail discovered that a window bar had been partially cut with what appeared to be a hacksaw blade. They also discovered that a desk’s base support and a window screen had been damaged.

Co…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. PuapuagaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. PuapuagaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. LenarzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. State v. WebbeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API