Legal Opinion

State v. Platt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2001No. 68750-1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Talmadge, J.*

We must decide in this case who bears the burden of proof at a hearing under RCW 10.77.150 on the conditional release of an individual found not guilty of a felony by reason of insanity and committed to a state hospital for treatment. Based on the language of RCW 10.77.150 and RCW 10.77.200, we hold the individual committed to the state hospital bears the burden of proving he or she is a fit subject for conditional release to a community setting. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

*244ISSUE

Under RCW 10.77.150, who bears the burden of proof when an individual found not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. David Earl WattletonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Reiter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. CarnehWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. CarnehWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BeaverWashington Supreme Court · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API