Legal Opinion

State v. Beaver

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2015No. 91112-6PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 — We must determine whether due process requires the trial court find current mental illness to revoke an insanity acquittee’s conditional release. Chapter 10.77 RCW, the statutory scheme that governs insanity acquittals, requires the trial court find that a conditionally released insanity acquittee violated the conditions of release or poses a threat to the public to revoke an insanity acquittee’s conditional release. Chapter 10.77 RCW does not require the trial court make a finding regarding the acquittee’s mental state at a conditional release revocation hearing. We hold that the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V William Edward LundstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. 4518 S. 256th, LLC v. Karen L. Gibbon, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. HarmonWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In re the Detention of M.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API