Legal Opinion

United States v. David Earl Wattleton

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 2002No. 00-13125, 00-14549PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

The defendant David Earl Wattleton was indicted for making bomb threats, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e), and the jury rendered an insanity verdict. At a post-verdict hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243(d), the district court determined that Wattleton was not eligible for release. On appeal, Wattleton contends (1) that the government impermissibly imposed the insanity defense on him at trial, (2) that § 4243(d)’s placing the burden of proof on the insanity acquittee at the post-verdict hearing violates his due process rights, and (3) that the court erred in denying…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Grayden v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
  4. Revels v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. WeedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API