United States v. David Earl Wattleton
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
The defendant David Earl Wattleton was indicted for making bomb threats, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e), and the jury rendered an insanity verdict. At a post-verdict hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243(d), the district court determined that Wattleton was not eligible for release. On appeal, Wattleton contends (1) that the government impermissibly imposed the insanity defense on him at trial, (2) that § 4243(d)’s placing the burden of proof on the insanity acquittee at the post-verdict hearing violates his due process rights, and (3) that the court erred in denying…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Grayden v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
- Revels v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WeedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.