Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Petersen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1999No. 65866-8PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

— We decide in this case whether committed sexually violent predators who seek appellate review of annual show cause hearings concerning their continuing confinement may appeal as of right, or whether they must file a motion for discretionary review. Where the trial court finds in a hearing under RCW 71.09.090(2) there is no probable cause to believe a violent sexual predator’s condition has changed, an appellate court reviews such a decision under the provisions of RAP 2.3(b).

We also decide whether the 1997 finding that Petersen, who has been confined as a sexually violent predator since…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Detention of Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of SkylstadWashington Supreme Court · 2007

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API