Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Roland Roy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 26, 1985No. 85-1047PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:
The Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (the “Agreement”), 18 U.S.C. app. pp. 545-48 (1982), provides a mechanism by which a prosecutor in one jurisdiction, the “[receiving [s]tate,” id. art. 11(c), may secure the presence of a prisoner who is serving a sentence in another jurisdiction, the “[sjending [sjtate,” id. art. 11(b), in order to try him on charges pending in the receiving state, id. art. IV(a). Once the receiving state commences criminal proceedings through this mechanism, the Agreement affords the prisoner certain protections. Article IV(c) provides-…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Joel Robert ScheerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Norman Gaylord ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. RoyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. Thomas NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Dale Scott HunnewellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Paredes-BatistaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Michael RoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Charles E. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.