Legal Opinion
Lee v. Seattle-First National Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1956No. 33606PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This appeal from a decree of distribution involves the construction of the trust provisions, of a will. The pertinent provisions are as follows:
“Fifth: Upon the death of my said son, Fairman Bur-bidge Lee, my trustee, Seattle-First National Bank, is authorized to pay to each of my said grandchildren so much from the income and/or principal, of my said estate as my said trustee shall deem necessary and proper for the maintenance, health and education of such grandchild until he shall have completed his education, but not after he shall have attained the age of twenty-five (25) years.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Denny v. HylandWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Betchard v. IversonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Nuhse v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- O'Shaughnessy v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Tipp's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Trueax v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Hagemann v. National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- In Re France's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.