Legal Opinion

Denny v. Hyland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1931No. 22743. Department TwoPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted to secure the construction of the residuary paragraph of the will of Catharine O. Denny, who died in Seattle, March 18,1926. Defendants Ivan L. Hyland and Robert Orr Denny were nominated by the testatrix as her executors. Under the will, which was duly filed for pro bate, the only devisees and legatees are plaintiff Merle Wilson Denny and defendants Grace Denny Suydam, Arthur A. Denny II, Helen Denny Carnahan, and Robert Orr Denny. Plaintiff prays that the fourth paragraph of the will, providing for the disposition of the residue of the estate in trust, be decreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Shufeldt v. ShufeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McGill v. Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Everett Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Waxed Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Betchard v. IversonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lee v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API