Legal Opinion

Hagemann v. National Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 1, 1977No. Record 760745PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoff, J.

In this appeal, we are asked to construe a will to determine whether the residuary clause violates the rule against perpetuities.

The will of Mildred Hart Woodward, executed January 15, 1971, was admitted to probate on March 16, 1971, and National Bank and Trust Company, the trustee named in the will, qualified as administrator, c.t.a. The testatrix was survived by her children, Anne Mutter Woodward Hagemann, Fletcher D. Woodward, Jr., and Malcolm P. Woodward, her sole heirs at law, all of whom were named as beneficiaries in her will.

Article Eight, the residuary clause of the will, creates two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. George Johnston's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Closset v. BurtchaellOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Driskill v. CarwileSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Andrews v. LincolnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  5. Nelson v. Mercantile Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Norton v. Georgia Railroad Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Austin v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  3. Joseph v. PollakDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  4. Elliott v. GriffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  5. Hoover v. JolleyWinchester County Circuit Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API