Legal Opinion
State v. Langill
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 4, 2008No. 2007-300PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
Pursuant to RSA 606:10 (2001), the State appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Coffey, J.) to exclude expert testimony concerning the identification of a fingerprint of the defendant, Richard Langill. We reverse and remand.
I
The record supports the following relevant facts. On March 25,2004, the police responded to a report of a burglary at an apartment in Derry. The complainant informed the police that someone had stolen $1,200 from a safe in her bedroom bureau and approximately five dollars in coins from a bottle. On April 1, 2004, the police lifted latent prints from the bureau,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Devall DavidsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Hon. bernstein/hermanArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LamySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. HynesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. GubitosiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.