Legal Opinion
State v. Hynes
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 5, 2009No. 2008-371PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Daniel P. Hynes, appeals his conviction after a jury trial in Superior Court (Barry, J.) of one count of theft by extortion. See RSA 637:5, II(i) (2007). We affirm.
I. Background
The jury could have found the following facts. The defendant is an attorney who was admitted to the New Hampshire and Massachusetts Bars in 2006. In December of that year, he sent a “Cease and Desist/Demand Letter” to Claudia Lambert, the owner of Claudia’s Signature Salon in Concord (the salon). The letter, written on “Daniel P. Hynes Esq.” letterhead and noting his admission to the New Hampshire Bar,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tammie Ackelson v. Manley Toy Direct, L.L.C. And Toy Network, L.L.C. v. Manley Toy Direct, L.L.C.. And Toy Network, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Pagan v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- State v. Max WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. PloofSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.