Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Bank of Beaufort

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, J".

Tbe controversy must be determined upon tbe facts found by tbe court, wbicb are no less conclusive than tbe verdict of a jury. When tbe plaintiff delivered bis check for $8,000 to- tbe cashier for tbe purchase of State bonds, tbe bank gave tbe plaintiff a receipt in wbicb it was stipulated that tbe bonds should be delivered to him upon demand and upon bis surrender of tbe receipt, and that record of tbe check should be entered on bis book only when tbe bonds were placed in bis bands. Tbe parties evidently contemplated no change in tbe relation previously existing between them until…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Parker v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. First & Citizens National Bank v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. In re the Liquidation of the Bank of PenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Dupree v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGuinn v. . High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Mitchell v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. McGuinn v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Federal Life Insurance v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API