Parker v. Central Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.
The questions of law involved in the appeal may be stated as follows:(1) Is the deposit which is the subject of the controversy “a deposit for a specific purpose” as contemplated and defined by law?(2) Does such deposit entitle the owner or beneficiary thereof to a preferred claim upon the assets of an insolvent bank?
Bank deposits are classified by law as general deposits, special deposits, and deposits for a specific purpose. The definitions of such de posits are set forth in Corporation Commission v. Trust Co., 193 N. C., 696, 138 S. E., 22. Tbe Court says: “A deposit for a specific purpose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- First & Citizens National Bank v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- First National Bank of Richmond v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Bank v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Corporation Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3Cited by25 opinions
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Flack v. . Hood, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Busher, Clerk v. Fulton, Supt.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Cocke v. Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- In re the Liquidation of the Bank of PenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.