Legal Opinion

In re the Liquidation of the Bank of Pender

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 8, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

If a depositor in a bank takes a cashier’s check for his deposit, and thereafter surrenders the cashier’s check, purchasing with the proceeds, a draft for the purchase price of Liberty Bonds, and the bank is closed before the draft is paid, does such transaction constitute a preference?

The claimant received Liberty Bonds for the cash which he deposited in the bank. Consequently, the only question to be determined is whether the transaction with the cashier’s check and draft constitutes a preference. The question of law must be answered in the negative. The trans*145action did not constitute a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morecock v. . HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Parker v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Bank of BeaufortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Dupree v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Fulton, Supt. v. RundellOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Royal Mfg. Co. v. SpradlinDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API