Legal Opinion

McGuinn v. City of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

At tbe threshold of the case, it may be well to recall that a municipality is limited in its authority .to venture upon an enterprise such as here contemplated. Its powers are different from those usually granted to a public-service corporation, for it serves a single community while the latter may serve many. Nevertheless, the authority of a municipality is generally ample for its own purposes. Lutterloh v. Fayetteville, 149 N. C., 65, 62 S. E., 758; George v. Asheville, 80 Fed. (2d), 50, 103 A. L. R., 568.

Further, by way of preliminary observation, it may be noted that where the parties…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. Town of Grimesland v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Keeter v. Town of Lake LureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Cauble v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Karpark Corp. v. Town of GrahamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API