McGuinn v. City of High Point
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
At tbe threshold of the case, it may be well to recall that a municipality is limited in its authority .to venture upon an enterprise such as here contemplated. Its powers are different from those usually granted to a public-service corporation, for it serves a single community while the latter may serve many. Nevertheless, the authority of a municipality is generally ample for its own purposes. Lutterloh v. Fayetteville, 149 N. C., 65, 62 S. E., 758; George v. Asheville, 80 Fed. (2d), 50, 103 A. L. R., 568.
Further, by way of preliminary observation, it may be noted that where the parties…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Town of Grimesland v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Keeter v. Town of Lake LureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Cauble v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Karpark Corp. v. Town of GrahamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.