Legal Opinion

Ancrum v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 4, 1931No. 13266PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabeer.

The undisputed facts out of which this action arose are as follows : In the fall of 1929, the part of the state highway adjoining the bridge over Hanging Rock Creek in Kershaw County was undermined by flood waters, due to very heavy rainfall. In order that traffic might pass, the defendant built a ramp or temporary bridge over that portion of the highway undermined, leading up to the main bridge over the creek. On October 7, 1929, the plaintiff drove his car over this ramp onto the main bridge, where, for some reason, the car broke…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Ouzts v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Fann v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Bynum v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Bomar v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Jeff Hunt MacHinery Co. v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API