Legal Opinion

Jeff Hunt MacHinery Co. v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 9, 1950No. 16396PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This case is here on the pleadings. The questions involved are:

May a person whose property has been damaged by reason of a defect in a State highway but who has been fully reimbursed for such loss under a policy of insurance, maintain an action against the State Highway Department for the amount of such damage under Section 5887 of the 1942 Code of Laws for South Carolina?

Is the ferry which crosses the Inland Waterway at a point south of Georgetown, known as South Island Ferry, part of a State highway within the contemplation of the section of the Code above mentioned?

Respondent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States Casualty Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Grace Ex Rel. Grangers Mut. Ins. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  5. Ancrum v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Lyon & Sons, Inc. v. N. C. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API