Ouzts v. State Highway Department
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Stabrer.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries, brought under the Act of 1928 (35 Stat., 2055). The complaint alleges that “the plaintiff * * * is the duly-appointed guardian ad litem of his daughter, Nina B. Ouzts, a minor six years of age”; that, on September 30, 1929, while walking along one of the public highways of the State, she was struck and injured by a truck owned and operated by the State Highway Department; that neither she nor the persons charged with her custody and control brought about her injuries or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- United States Casualty Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Faust v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Foster v. City of UnionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jack v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Coral Gables, Inc. v. Palmetto Brick Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Ancrum v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Owens v. State Highway Dept.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.