Legal Opinion
Wissman v. General Tire Co. of Philadelphia, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 12, 1937No. Appeal, 175PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
On June 3, 1933, the defendant tire corporation equipped a White truck belonging to the Liquid Carbonic Corporation with new tires. One of the rims and the lock ring that accompanied it were cracked. The defective condition was noticed by defendant’s employees and the fact was communicated to the driver in charge of the truck. Three days later the. vehicle was sent to the White Motor Company for adjustment of the brakes, an operation necessitating the removal of the wheels. Plaintiff, one of the employees of the White Motor Company assigned to the job, was injured…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rosebrock v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Bisson v. John B. Kelly, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Griffith v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by15 opinions
- Norman I. Suchomajcz, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Suchomajcz, a Minor v. Hummel Chemical Company, Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Mannsz v. MacWhyte Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- EI DuPONT DE NEM. & CO. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.