City and County of San Francisco v. Pacello
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWEENEY, J. *
Plaintiff, City and County of San Francisco, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action seeking to abate an alleged public nuisance.
Statement of Facts
The subject structure had originally been built in 1925, authorized by a permit to construct a residential, one-family, two-story building. From 1929 on the building had the separate unit in it and it had two addresses. A 1921 zoning ordinance authorized two-family dwellings in R-l districts as a permitted use (under certain conditions).
Defendants, the Pacellos, purchased the property, 152-154 Madrid Street…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bank of America NT&SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Boys Club of San Fernando Valley, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Foundation for San Francisco's Architectural Heritage v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Golden Gate Water Ski Club v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Lugo v. LugoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.