Legal Opinion

City and County of San Francisco v. Pacello

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1978No. Civ. 41280PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SWEENEY, J. *

Plaintiff, City and County of San Francisco, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action seeking to abate an alleged public nuisance.

Statement of Facts

The subject structure had originally been built in 1925, authorized by a permit to construct a residential, one-family, two-story building. From 1929 on the building had the separate unit in it and it had two addresses. A 1921 zoning ordinance authorized two-family dwellings in R-l districts as a permitted use (under certain conditions).

Defendants, the Pacellos, purchased the property, 152-154 Madrid Street…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bank of America NT&SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Boys Club of San Fernando Valley, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Foundation for San Francisco's Architectural Heritage v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Golden Gate Water Ski Club v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Lugo v. LugoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API