Legal Opinion

Downtown Associates, Ltd. v. Burrows Bros. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1986No. 51076PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn McManamon, J.

Plaintiff Downtown Associates, Ltd. (the “lessor”) appeals from a summary judgment against it and in favor of Burrows Bros. Co. (the “lessee”), the defendant in an action for alleged breach of a percentage rental agreement. The lessor’s appeal is timely, and raises three assignments of error 1 which will be consolidated for review. From the record before us, we hold that the trial court correctly concluded that the express provisions of the lease, construed in light of the circumstances, compel summary judgment as a matter of law.

The lessor is the successor in interest under a lease executed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stop & Shop, Inc. v. GanemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Myers v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Kretch v. StarkSandusky County Court of Common Pleas · 1962
  5. Bastian v. Albertson's, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langfan v. Carlton Gardens Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Timber Ridge Investments Ltd. v. MarcusOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Jcf Investments v. Housholder, 17-08-11 (10-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Hamilton West Development, Ltd. v. Hills Stores Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
  5. Mapletown Foods, Inc. v. Mid-America Mgmt. Corp., 88509 (6-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API