Legal Opinion

Myers v. East Ohio Gas Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1977No. 76-1007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWxmiAM B. Brown, J.

The main issue presented by this cause is whether a “Supplemental Gas Storage Agreer ment” for a primary term, followed by a grant of uncertain *123duration that conditions termination upon the occurrence of an event within the control of the “lessee,” gives rise to a tenancy at will once the primary term has expired.

• In the Rayl case, supra (46 Ohio App. 2d 167), the' Court of Appeals for Summit County held that a gas storage agreement, terminable after a ten-year primary period upon the failure of the “lessee” to produce, store or withdraw gas from underground storage areas became a tenancy at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hinman v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Charles Ilfeld Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Lindlay v. RaydureDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1917
  4. Thompson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Hallock v. KintzlerOhio Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wray v. WymerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hupp v. Beck Energy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Langfan v. Carlton Gardens Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Ochsenbine v. Village of CadizOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. James Henry v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API