Stop & Shop, Inc. v. Ganem
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
The defendants in this bill for declaratory relief are lessors under a percentage lease. They have appealed from the final decree in the Superior Court that ruled that the lease does not expressly or impliedly require the plaintiff, as lessee, to use the demised premises for any particular purpose or to keep the premises open and there engage in the supermarket business. Except for brief testimony which is reported, the facts were stipulated.
The lease, dated August 24,1953, demised a lot and building at 154 Merrimack Street, Haverhill, for thirteen years and six months from September 1,1953,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Dion v. Board of Appeals of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- First National Bank of Boston v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- City of Haverhill v. George Brox, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Adelson v. HananelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.