Legal Opinion
Ostertag v. Overall (In Re Overall)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 28, 2000No. 18-61410PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Chief Judge.
This is a dischargeability action under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). Debtor-Defendant Judith Overall is the former spouse of Plaintiff Michael Ostertag. One child was born of that marriage, but that child was later adopted by Judith’s current husband, Edward Overall. Plaintiff continued to pay child support once the child had been adopted, because he did not know that the adoption had taken place. Debtor received such funds, and has refused to return them to plaintiff. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) over which the Court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Sterna v. Paneras (In Re Paneras)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fosco v. Fosco (In Re Fosco)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 965 Health Benefit Plan v. Westfall (In Re Westfall)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- Liddell v. Peckham (In Re Peckham)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- United States v. Hampton (Hampton)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- United States v. Pipkin (In re Pipkin)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.