Legal Opinion
Gibson Tex, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1998No. 96 CIV. 8513(PKL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gibson Tex, Inc. (“Gibson”) brings this action for copyright infringement pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976, Title 17, United States Code (“U.S.C.”), Sections 101-1010, against defendants Sears Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) and L.A. Intimates (“LAI”), a division of Kellwood Company, Inc. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Sears and LAI move for summary judgment. Gibson opposes defendants’ motion and cross-moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Ideal Toy Corporation v. Fab-Lu Ltd. (Inc.) and David FaberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yurman Design, Inc. v. Golden Treasure Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Yurman Design, Inc. v. Paj, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Ranieri v. Adirondack Dev. Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Marya v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Tufenkian Import/Export Ventures, Inc. v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002