Legal Opinion
Yurman Design, Inc. v. Paj, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 11, 2000No. 98 CIV. 8697 RWSPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
On November 1, 1999, a jury found defendant PAJ, Inc. (“PAJ”) liable for copyright infringement, trade dress infringement under the Lanham Act, and common law unfair competition. In separate motions, PAJ has moved (1) to set aside the jury’s verdict concerning damages or, alternatively, for a new trial or remittitur of damages; and (2) for judgment as a matter of law on certain of plaintiff Yurman Design, Inc.’s (“Yurman Design”) claims, or alternatively for a new trial. In its post-trial submissions, Yurman Design has also pressed, inter alia, for the issuance of…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Yurman Design, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Paj, Inc., Doing Business as Prime Art & Jewel, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. v. Krypton Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. TenenbaumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- U-Neek, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.