California School Employees Ass'n v. Bonita Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, Acting P. J.
— For decades, the Education Code did not permit classified employees of public school districts to submit disciplinary disputes to binding arbitration. Rather, the district’s governing board had broad and sole authority to make disciplinary decisions. In 2001, the Legislature addressed the subject. The result was a statute — not yet construed by the courts — that allows classified employees to arbitrate certain disciplinary matters (Ed. Code, § 45113, subd. (e) (section 45113(e)).
Here, a school district summarily terminated a classified employee, declining to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Board of Education of the Round Valley Unified School District v. Round Valley Teachers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Palo Alto v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- Almeida v. Antelope Valley Union High School Dist. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Palo Alto v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Wu v. Public Employment Relations Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2023