Legal Opinion

City of Palo Alto v. Public Employment Relations Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 2016No. H041407Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Since 1978, article V of the City of Palo Alto’s (hereafter, City) charter provided that impasses in negotiations regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for the City’s police and firefighters would be submitted to binding interest arbitration. In 2011, the Palo Alto City Council (City Council) voted to place on the ballot for the upcoming election a measure that repealed this binding interest arbitration provision. Real party in interest the International Association of Firefighters, Local 1319, AFL-CIO (IAFE) filed an unfair practice charge with…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API