Legal Opinion
Scientific Mfg. Co. v. Walker
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 13, 1941No. 753PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiffs prayed for an injunction prohibiting Frank Walker, Postmaster General, and Joseph Conrad, Postmaster at Scranton, Pennsylvania, from enforcing the terms of a fraud order issued by the Postmaster General under date of August 16, 1941, pursuant to the authority contained in 39 U.S.C.A., § 259, and § 732.
On August 21, 1941, the plaintiffs instituted this proceeding by filing a complaint against the “United States of America, Postal Service Department.” A summons captioned in this manner was duly issued and delivered to the Marshal for service.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Butterworth v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Colorado v. TollSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brooks v. DewarSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Conference on Legalizing Lotteries, Inc. v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Neher v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Acret v. HarwoodDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
- Federal Landlords Committee, Inc. v. WoodsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Hartmann v. Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- Davis v. FlemmingDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.