Legal Opinion
Hartmann v. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 1944No. 3443PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia seeking injunctive relief by reason of the “blocking” or “freezing” of his bank account by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States.
Complainant alleges that the defendant by letter 1 advised him of the “blocking” of his account and stated therein that the action of the Secretary was predicated on his “determination” that the plaintiff “was a national of a foreign country designated in Executive Order 8389, as amended, and within the meaning of Section 5(b) of the Trading with the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blackmar v. GuerreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Podovinnikoff v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- Clement Martin, Inc. v. Dick Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.