Wheatley v. Planning Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants-appellants, the owners of a proposed subdivision, appeal from a trial judge’s denial of their motion to amend the judgment that was entered in conformity with our rescript in Wheatley v. Planning Bd. of Hingham, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 435, 451 (1979). The motion was filed pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 59(e), 365 Mass. 828 *885(1974). It was based upon an assertion that our opinion contemplated further consideration by the planning board of the previously submitted plan rather than submission of a new plan and that to that extent our re-script was inconsistent with the principles expressed in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- Smith v. Building Commissioner of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Wheatley v. Planning Board of HinghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Musto v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Roberts v. Worcester Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Encon Industries, Inc. v. Heritage Distributors, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
- Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Griffith v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.