Legal Opinion

Wheatley v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 10, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants-appellants, the owners of a proposed subdivision, appeal from a trial judge’s denial of their motion to amend the judgment that was entered in conformity with our rescript in Wheatley v. Planning Bd. of Hingham, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 435, 451 (1979). The motion was filed pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 59(e), 365 Mass. 828 *885(1974). It was based upon an assertion that our opinion contemplated further consideration by the planning board of the previously submitted plan rather than submission of a new plan and that to that extent our re-script was inconsistent with the principles expressed in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Smith v. Building Commissioner of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Wheatley v. Planning Board of HinghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Musto v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Roberts v. Worcester Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Encon Industries, Inc. v. Heritage Distributors, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Griffith v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API