Musto v. Planning Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
The Medfield planning board appeals from a decision of the Land Court, which overturned the planning board’s denial of the Mustos’ definitive subdivision plan.2 The judge found that the planning board’s decision was not legitimately *832based on any of the three stated reasons for the denial but was instead principally motivated by a desire to limit the number of lots developed on the locus to fewer than would be permissible under the subdivision control law and the town’s rules and regulations. On appeal, the planning board contends that the judge misapplied pertinent law; it does not contend…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Freeman v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Roberts v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Krafchuk v. Planning Board of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- 311 West Broadway LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Lakeside Builders, Inc. v. Planning Board of FranklinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Wall Street Development Corp. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Oliva v. BairdMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.