Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Schramek
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 15, 1993No. 77871PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
616 So.2d 979 (1993)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner,
v.
Daniel E. SCHRAMEK, etc., Respondent.
No. 77871.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 15, 1993.
Rehearing Denied June 7, 1993.
Lori Holcomb, Asst. UPL Counsel, Tallahassee, John A. Yanchunis of Blasingame, Forizs & Smiljanich, P.A., and Howard P. Ross of Battaglia, Ross, Hastings & Dicus, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.
Daniel E. Schramek, pro se.
2Per curiam
This cause is before the Court on The Florida Bar's petition to enjoin the respondent, Daniel E. Schramek, individually and d/b/a Schramek & Associates and The L.A.W. Clinic, Inc., from the unlicensed practice…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Florida Bar v. BrumbaughSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- The Florida Bar v. MosesSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- The Florida Bar v. FurmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Samuels v. American Legal Clinic, Inc. (In Re Samuels)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- In Re Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KathmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Amendments Regulating Bar-AdvertisingSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. NeimanSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.