Legal Opinion

Amendments Regulating Bar-Advertising

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 17, 1999No. 92,297PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

762 So.2d 392 (1999)

AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR-ADVERTISING RULES.

No. 92,297.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 17, 1999.

Edith G. Osman, President, The Florida Bar, Miami, Florida, Howard C. Coker, Past-president, The Florida Bar, Jacksonville, Florida, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Paul F. Hill, General Counsel and Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida; Cynthia A. Everett, Chair, Rules Committee, Miami, Florida; Benjamin H. Hill, III, Chair, Joint Presidential Task Force on Advertising, Tampa, Florida; Timothy P.…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wells; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Pariente.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harrell v. the Florida BarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Doe v. America Online, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. State v. BradfordSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. T.M. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API