Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Neiman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 2, 2002No. SC94738PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
816 So.2d 587 (2002)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Brian NEIMAN and Brian Neiman, Inc., a Florida corporation, Respondents.
No. SC94738.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 2, 2002.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Mary Ellen Bateman, UPL Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL; Jacquelyn Plasner Needelman, Branch UPL Counsel; and Allan James Sullivan, Co-Bar Counsel of Sullivan & Rivero, P.A., Miami, FL, for Complainant.
H. Dohn Williams, Jr. of Hicks, Anderson & Kneale, P.A., Miami, FL, for Respondents.
2Per curiam
We have for review a referee's report recommending that Brian Neiman, individually,…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Edelstein v. WilentzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- The Florida Bar v. SchramekSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Florida Ass'n of Professional Lobbyists, Inc. v. Division of Legislative Information ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- The FLORIDA BAR Re ADVISORY OPINION-SCHARRER v. FUNDAMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICESSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Florida Bar v. AbreuSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.