Legal Opinion

Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 7, 2000No. 99-7062, 99-7066PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.

This action was brought by Samuel Smith under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51, against his employer, Union Pacific Railroad Company, for injuries he allegedly suffered in connection with his work. In Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gottshall, 512 U.S. 532, 114 S.Ct. 2396, 129 L.Ed.2d 427 (1994), the Supreme Court held that an employee may recover damages under FELA for mental or emotional injuries only where the employee can show he was within a zone of danger of physical impact. We are required here to determine whether a railroad employee’s sleep…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Medlock v. Ortho Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Steven L. Wilson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. John Rivera v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Goodrich v. Long Island Rail Road Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. William C. Skye v. Maersk LineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Higgins v. Metro-North RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API