Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew J. Lococo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1972No. 26336PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Loeoco appeals from his conviction upon one count of perjury based upon his false testimony before a federal grand jury that he had not talked to Ray Mirr during the previous year. 1 Lococo con tends that (1) his testimony was not material to the grand jury’s investigation, (2) the district court prejudicially erred in admitting, over his objections, the records of about 83 telephone calls to Mirr’s home and business telephone charged to Lococo’s business telephone, and (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction.
Lococo and his wife are the sole…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Samuel StoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Leo Vitello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Jack Fineberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Joan McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward LoeswickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Irving B. Kahn and Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. BliesnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. William P. Reilly, United States of America v. John Patrick DowdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.