Legal Opinion

United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward Loeswick

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1988No. 86-1061, 86-1062PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

Frederick Gordon and Edward Loeswick appeal from their convictions for conspiracy (Count I), obstruction of justice (Counts II and III), and perjury (Counts IY, Y, VI and VII). The convictions arose out of an alleged agreement between Gordon, Loe-swiek and Vernon Edler to direct Lockheed subcontracts for the Trident Missile to Edler Industries to the exclusion of other potential subcontractors. Appellants claim that their convictions should be reversed because Count I of the indictment was duplicitous, hearsay testimony of a coconspir-ator was impermissibly admitted,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Richard AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. David SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Coral v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API